Go Back   ERISABoard > ERISA Discussion > Changes To Statute Or Regulations


Today's Top 5
Posters (by posts)Threads (by views)Newest Posts ERISA News by Yahoo 
Leila Louzri
11th Cir. – Statute (135)
Work Stress and Depr (0)
8th Cir. – Ambiguous (0)
De Novo Review Award (0)
Lapsed Life Insuranc (0)
Reliance on Benefits Guid
Change of Beneficiary Des
11th Cir. – Statute of Li
Approval of LTD Claim Blo
Own Occ Awarded, Any Occ

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-08-2011, 12:31 PM   #1
Roger Baron
Roger Baron's Avatar

Roger Baron's Facebook profile
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 279
Default Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011

Congress recently passed the Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011. President Obama signed this new bill into law yesterday.

This new law is not specific to ERISA, but it may have an impact on ERISA related litigation.

The enrolled bill may be viewed at

A summary of the bill may be viewed at

Below is my summary. This is just a summary and I caution you not to rely on my words, but to review the actual language of the new law. As best I can determine, in a relatively short amount of review, the new law makes the following changes:

1) Makes certain that the recent amendment (which equates a permanent alien’s citizenship with his state of permanent residence) does not create a new basis for diversity jurisdiction.

2) Specifically delineates the rules for determining the citizenship of a corporate insurer

3) Many issues regarding REMOVAL to Federal Court, including: a) specific direction to the federal trial court to sever all nonremovable claims and remand them to state court; b) specifying that only defendants against whom a removable claim has been lodged must consent to the removal; c) separates requirements for removal of civil cases and criminal cases into two separate categories; d) establishes required elements for the notice of removal, addressing amount in controversy issues which evolve under state pleading requirements and claims for non-monetary relief; e) permitting removal on the basis of diversity more than 1 year after commencement of action in certain cases;

4) Venue matters regarding general civil venue;

5) Expanding ability of the trial court to make a 1404(a) transfer by permitting such transfers to a district or division to which all parties have consented;

6) Prohibiting transfer from a U.S. District Court to the Districts of Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands.
Roger Baron is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:49 AM.

CAUTION: Do not divulge your "secret theories" or confidential information on this website. This site has hundreds of users including plaintiff's lawyers, defense lawyers, in-house counsel for various companies and insurers, and professors of law among other attorneys interested in ERISA issues. If you post on this site, it will be read and your post could even possibly be read by your opposing counsel in a particular matter or your opposing party's in-house counsel. This is a forum for the exchange of general information between all lawyers interested in ERISA issues. IT IS NOT a place to strategize regarding any particular case or issue.

SITE DISCLAIMER: Nothing posted in any forum on this website is legal advice nor should it be interpreted as such in any circumstance. All posts reflect the views and opinions of the person posting only and are not the view of this website, its Administrator or Moderators.

Google Reader Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to My AOL Add to Technorati Favorites!
Provided by SLB Development
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.